Public Impartiality Request

[LIVE PUBLIC DRAFT]

“Public.” Members of public, relations both acquainted or unacquainted.

“Impartiality”. Without bias, alignment, fixed or absolute opinion. Unfiltered or untethered judgments.

“Request”. A plea. An asking. A need.

[LIVE PUBLIC DRAFT]

Welcome to the Internet’s least visited independent thoughts on the alternative sides of nutrition.

Here in this article I solemnly request for all, as the title implies, impartial and/or free from subconscious bias ~ expression from any or all visitors.

Especially in view of the more “frank” themes and topics I discuss, much of which is anti-typical of health there comes certain degree stigma, among small content creators and/or aspiring authors especially who maintains and leads multiple live(s) out of necessity.  Work, and outside at work.

What happens here is propensity for misinformed or erroneous judgments cumulative upon real or factual interactions amidst multiple social ecosystems. Family and not family. Work and not work.

Why / rationale behind this request.

Privacy & Scientific solidarity.

Some content creators are not fazed at all about their “other” live(s) outside of work. Perhaps they’re a socialite. A butterfly. Care-free.Or perhaps – they’re just that well protected or secured – if anything goes against them.

My shoes? Complete opposite. Always volatile. My industry /bread and butter often expects pretentious, bubbly and butterfly first impressions.

The quiet? The thinking type? Usually go against the grain.

For context I live and interact in a city where, unsurprisingly to many people – someone knows somebody else.

You may have seen me in public. “We” may even have worked together in the past. “When” does not really matter. Likewise “Where“, “How” is not the problem.It is the “What” happens afterwards, if someone stumbles across this channel for the very first time. Like all first times, reactions do matter.

And there, is is where judgments often derive from the closest and readily abundant moral heuristics. You can guess what that is. First impressions.

Topics and themes surrounding expired foods, meanwhile blending with autoimmune diseases, FODMAPs, and social experiments may conjure reactions from many I am perhaps too boisterous. Or that I have “problems”. Or worse – I have multiple personality disorders, thinking that I can voluntarily “switch” one persona to another.

Not always sunshine or rainbows, being a “content creator”.

As a “person” (don’t know if that should be politically a “pronoun”) ~ I do not care one iota about that person’s vices. Serial this, serial that. Hyper this, hyper that. 

Every virtue spares a vice. And vice versa. Human nature is inherently selfish.

“Big deal” one may say. But that is only one (1) perspective, as the observer. But not the speaker. You hide behind comfortable anonymity of the guest persona.

People (can) change. Rationally or not, that is the question for them to rationalize. And not me to decide. Because I cannot control others opinion of me.

However, until ~ one misinforms the other, that changes our relationship landscape. Where-ever is not permissive should a frown be expressed, then what happens? One therefore has to indemnify. “That is not me.” . “I am doing this because I think it’s meaningful to me or insert <XYZ>.” 

No matter how much I bear no ill wishes, or “wills” against anyone. As “content creator” and “aspiring author” – going against a grain of salt, is inevitable.

Conclusion.

One would argue that “freedom of speech”, is a human right next to nutrition, shelter, and clothing. But none of this, is automatically, a given. I do not believe in “free” will (did “you” pick your parents?”).

It doesn’t actually take much effort, technically or mechanically at all – to “speak”. But when, where, what, how? immediately becomes socio political.

Conscious precedes conscience. The more awareness one hopefully gains by reading this, the better and benevolent we can all be, letting go presumptions and get – for sake of it all – discussion on the table. Food for thoughts. Or perhaps better thoughts from food.  

Many people I’d wager, out of necessity, and survival, lead multiple live(s). Controversial? No. At least I hope not. But my opinion remains my own and sadly, not the wider “majority”, nor can I control the “moral heuristic” (that is – readily sources, evidences or proclamations on me, heavily discounted).

I welcome any or all to this channel without any condition. So long as you permit yourself, unconditionally likewise to not let your subconscious opinion elsewhere on me clouds your judgment.

In any case, I do apologise for the heavy handed writing this once again.

And welcome – to the Internet’s last and perhaps least visited ~ independent thoughts on wellness and nutrition.

Live-It-Forward,

AW / andrewwiguna.com
nutritional-humility.me
C. 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *