1. Context and Rationale behind this declaration.

This Limited Indemnity declaration presents This Author’s (AW)’s frank “credibility” limitations to nevertheless support its scientific benevolence for the discerning demographics it appeals within alternative realms of health & fitness. All without monetary incentive nor profit throughout all its Book(s) or Manuscripts, articles and/or messages this channel implore to its audience. All this is carried by its prominent thematic or vision statement as follows:

“Decentralised Nutritional Science; through the lens of Structural Violence and Economics.”  

The most significant “Rationale” behind this Concept Initiative’s sole existence is to distinguish itself amongst present peers of health or fitness reclamation channels. It contemplates not only nuanced discussion of alternative nutritional concepts or “principles” but also to promote open, scientific dialogues as distanced away from mainstream literatures, and mass-media sensationalism.

“Health” and/or “Wellness” advocacy channels today stems exponentially from so called “influencer” gatherings within Social Media. It is well-acknowledged questions may brew ~on what “basis of credibility” amongst these influencers have in terms of “competence” or “authority” at prescribing “advices”, “fitness routines”, “suggestions” and/or “meal plans” and the like. 

However, their intents, as what This Author (AW) nevertheless acknowledge ~ shared mutual outcome for its demographics to self-champion against hardships or turbulences of inaccessibility by way/s of adapting and adopting these alternative nutritional “principles”. However, it remains respectful such that it is not by any means a linear “prescription”; nor  intended to override any or all clinical supervisions. 

1.1 Themes for distinctions

This Initiative comprise of  two (2) main overarching themes for distinctions away from likewise similar contemporary channels to date : 

1. Involuntary Structural Violence or Inaccessibility.  This is defined as involuntary frugality and/or sanctioned impositions upon any individual. This initiative not only share but examine effects from such prolonged involuntary and limited welfare subsistence. “Involuntary” – meaning without one’s consent.  And;
2. Addressing our crisis of Scientific Authoritarianism, and crisis of authentic practice of Autonomy. Our “established”, or “conventional” nutritional science dogmatism ~ the “balanced diet”, “healthy eating template”, “guidelines”, “status quo”, and.or “Everything-In-Moderation” remains highly subjective and questionably paternalistic. This Channel implores alternative nutritional science concepts and/or principles to further its readers’ willingness to  inquiring “health” and/or “fitness” not just from epidemiological perspective of many, but ultimately by way of individual “synthesis” from various competing dialogues and thesis.  

To reiterate ~ this Concept Initiative and its Parent Manuscript has been initially envisioned as an indirect coaching encouraged for readers’ willingly adjustments for his/her “own” lexicon, definition, sustenance, of such “autonomy”. However, the many included “workarounds”, “ideas”, or “plans” are only envisioned to represent open-ended strategy, never as linear methodology. Hence, readers remains ultimately responsible for furthering their own research, on top of the hundred(s) This channel and its manuscript(s) have thus sighted.