PREFACE & LIVE PUBLIC DRAFT NOTICE.
Here in this part 2 – is where I start diving to the meat and bones of this concept. As disclaimer again, this is my intellectual property. And as public disclosure my willingness to share its writing as it evolves to what I believe (and confident) to be share-able. Nevermind however, that as lone content creator – there are imperfections. Incomplete passages, split / missing connections between phrases, typo’s to name a few. I am only human. That – I believe serve purpose not to impress anyone. Rather – the very admission itself, is what is missing.
Internet Wayback Machine ~ early stamping
Also I have begun manually “stamping” this article series URL into the Internet’s Wayback Machine. This is so that I can impart these works as a historic “imprint”.
AI /Authenticity Statement
The concept itself does incorporate AI. But how? – I do not know. But the person behind this? Was anything but artificial. I have never resorted to paying “marketers” or “copywriters” ever since this channel began in 2015. For original authorship statement just to prove I am and was – the originator, please consider viewing my authorship statement here.
Having said all that let’s continue.
In Part 1….
I contextualised my app around the idea that journalling – at least from what I came to know my own self – while a useful tool to diagnose, is indeed still “reflection” exercise subjet loathsome routine. Yet also ~ a “closed-loop” system subject to its own pending (or impending) biases.
I realise that another “perspective” is needed (that – I get to explain later).
I implored that given the nuances of nutrition, with exorbitant expenses one typically goes for “self improvement” akin to Quantified Self movement~ eg nutrigenomics consult + on going other consults and tests, excluding “gadgetry” ~ all this ~ quickly amounts to another full-time job.
So what happens then, if we keep “writing” or journalling based from our own initial impulse, then re-encode them back to us? A day, a week a month or perhaps year – later? Can we “remind” ourselves this way? Maybe yes maybe not. That depends on our subjectivity, which this one would have to admit one way or another, privately inside – that none of us perfect. And that – leads us to biases.
Biases eventually forms a closed-loop system. In other words ~ How well “should” one care about the self after all, depends on how one wishes to write about themselves.
That right there – I believe – there needs to be somehow, a dialogue with another entity, willingly by consent obviously,~ completely observational in its ability, but privately, without judgment to belittle ~ to remind what we’ve logged and written. With “who” exactly? That – is where AI agent implementation, someway shape or form, or perhaps as best I could come to terms with – “perspective” – comes into the picture.
Next passages to come.
This next article will be split into several parts.