This is the first of the two part series on my first ever nutrigenomics consult, taken earlier this year of 2022.
Due to exceedingly overlapping obligations, demands of the rebrand, the rewriting of my entire manuscript, new web design and development challenges, and on top of it all - writing new content as continuing pledges I wholeheartedly apologize for this delay and untimely arrival for those who are angst or worse - speculate my forfeiting / inactivity simply at my own laziness or will. Patience appreciated.
AW / andrewwiguna.com
nutritional-humility.me
Firstly, what is nutrigenomics? In layman yet enthusiast terms - a study and consultation practice between practitioner and client over biochemistry implications in view and lens of genetics ~ explaining what your genes currently (and/or possibly future) foretells against all risks of mortality, and what foods impact and correlate on the basis of your's DNA input (usually by ways of brief - saliva cotton-bud cheek swabs).
Please note this does not constitute the same for all consultancies Australia wide.
Below is the entire timeline over what to expect:
The most common anxiety surrounding ways of dieting would be What foods should I eat?
Ascertaining what "works" and what doesn't, in terms arguably remains at times impossible for a general audience. Because, despite this being overly tiresome - everyone is an individual.
Nutrigenomics therefore help bridge together nuances of nutritional science ~ to that of the insights of a patient / client's DNA genetics. To facilitate and address the above question more specificity and intentionality given that you've consented for the DNA collection.
Nutrigenomics is not, sadly, sponsored or supported by any "government" backed schemes as they are considered a specific practice. Hence, why they are often costly. And ~ as possible disadvantage (more which is only reserved at a later section) - may not ably address an individual's concerns at length.
However given their wealth of insight undoubtedly, places the onus and back to the client. It might be easy to assume that "it will be fine" and "straightforward".
Believe me - I thought I had mine under control. And how mistaken I was.
This is a highly subjective question which the answer depends much on factors that are open for sensitive debates, which may not be appropriate to disclose as Nutrigenomics are highly individual and therefore exerts ~ individual, personal and in some cases - an emotional burden.
You need to be prepared for a lot of reading. Prior degrees on self-investments towards research, curiosity and of all nutritional explorations and patience amidst scientific literatures? Should be a given.
These reports I speculate - are less templated in many areas and instead, tailored. Just to give an idea, any single "report" based on a concern or category runs on average between 15 page all the way to 50+ pages. Adding all of these up, and especially if a "package" of tests are requested readers should anticipate up north of 100+ pages.
If you are easily apprehensive, then you might need to take up more consulting next steps (as likely offered by the agency) - they should be able to guide you through at re-clarifying the results again, and also prescribe / suggest - next series of tests. Be forewarned, costs on these can run quite steep.
So that concludes first section. Next comes the choice of my testing and the (few) results.
Live-It-Forward,
AW.